<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 736 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153747</link>
    <description>An adjudication confirming duty, penalty and confiscation was vitiated where the noticee was denied effective access to relied upon documents and meaningful time to examine voluminous records, and was not allowed cross-examination of witnesses whose statements supported the allegation. A demand for clandestine removal requires positive and corroborated evidence, including material such as raw material consumption, electricity use, sales and realization of proceeds; untested statements and incomplete disclosure were insufficient. The matter was remanded for fresh decision after compliance with natural justice and proper furnishing of the material relied upon.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:18:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 736 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153747</link>
      <description>An adjudication confirming duty, penalty and confiscation was vitiated where the noticee was denied effective access to relied upon documents and meaningful time to examine voluminous records, and was not allowed cross-examination of witnesses whose statements supported the allegation. A demand for clandestine removal requires positive and corroborated evidence, including material such as raw material consumption, electricity use, sales and realization of proceeds; untested statements and incomplete disclosure were insufficient. The matter was remanded for fresh decision after compliance with natural justice and proper furnishing of the material relied upon.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>