https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153745 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of a CHA license based on an employee's misconduct, emphasizing the lack of evidence linking the CHA to the employee's actions. The decision highlighted the necessity of specific findings against the CHA to justify license revocation, citing past cases where CHAs were not held responsible for employee misconduct without their knowledge or involvement. The Tribunal concluded that the revocation order lacked allegations against the CHA, leading to the appeal's success. en-us Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jun 2017 11:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153745 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of a CHA license based on an employee's misconduct, emphasizing the lack of evidence linking the CHA to the employee's actions. The decision highlighted the necessity of specific findings against the CHA to justify license revocation, citing past cases where CHAs were not held responsible for employee misconduct without their knowledge or involvement. The Tribunal concluded that the revocation order lacked allegations against the CHA, leading to the appeal's success. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153745