<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 733 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153739</link>
    <description>Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules did not require payment of 10% of transaction value on clearance of Spent Acid as a by-product without duty under Notification No. 6/02-C.E., because earlier Bombay High Court and Tribunal decisions supported the assessee&#039;s position. The Tribunal held that the demand was not sustainable on the facts, and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It also disapproved penalty action under Section 11AC, noting that repeated allegations of suppression were unwarranted where the assessee had followed an earlier decision in its own case and the issue remained arguable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 733 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153739</link>
      <description>Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules did not require payment of 10% of transaction value on clearance of Spent Acid as a by-product without duty under Notification No. 6/02-C.E., because earlier Bombay High Court and Tribunal decisions supported the assessee&#039;s position. The Tribunal held that the demand was not sustainable on the facts, and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It also disapproved penalty action under Section 11AC, noting that repeated allegations of suppression were unwarranted where the assessee had followed an earlier decision in its own case and the issue remained arguable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>