<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (4) TMI 268 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153718</link>
    <description>A court-appointed receiver managing a disputed business was not a &quot;dealer&quot; under section 2(c) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act because he was only supervising the business and was not carrying on buying or selling for commission, remuneration, or otherwise. He also did not fall within the deeming provision for mercantile agents. Even on an agency basis, sales tax liabilities left unpaid during the receivership remained enforceable against the principals after the receiver&#039;s appointment ended. As the assessments had become final, the tax demand was validly recoverable from the proprietors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 13:35:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (4) TMI 268 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153718</link>
      <description>A court-appointed receiver managing a disputed business was not a &quot;dealer&quot; under section 2(c) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act because he was only supervising the business and was not carrying on buying or selling for commission, remuneration, or otherwise. He also did not fall within the deeming provision for mercantile agents. Even on an agency basis, sales tax liabilities left unpaid during the receivership remained enforceable against the principals after the receiver&#039;s appointment ended. As the assessments had become final, the tax demand was validly recoverable from the proprietors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>