<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 242 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153707</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessees, determining that the deposit amount written off did not constitute the &quot;sale price&quot; of tins and was not subject to sales tax. The court concluded that the transactions between the assessees and their customers regarding the deposit for tins were bailments, not sales. Therefore, the court held that the assessees were not liable to pay sales tax on the deposit amount for tins.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 13:00:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 242 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153707</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessees, determining that the deposit amount written off did not constitute the &quot;sale price&quot; of tins and was not subject to sales tax. The court concluded that the transactions between the assessees and their customers regarding the deposit for tins were bailments, not sales. Therefore, the court held that the assessees were not liable to pay sales tax on the deposit amount for tins.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>