<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (1) TMI 233 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153703</link>
    <description>A composite contract requiring dredger components to move from West Bengal to Kashmir for assembly and delivery occasioned inter-State movement, because transportation, assembly, freight and insurance formed part of the bargain. That movement satisfied the statutory test for an inter-State sale under section 3(a) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and the transaction was therefore taxable as such. Section 4 did not convert the sale into an inside-Kashmir sale or displace the operation of section 3(a), as the provisions operated consistently on these facts. The reference was answered against the assessee and the assessment was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 12:45:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (1) TMI 233 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153703</link>
      <description>A composite contract requiring dredger components to move from West Bengal to Kashmir for assembly and delivery occasioned inter-State movement, because transportation, assembly, freight and insurance formed part of the bargain. That movement satisfied the statutory test for an inter-State sale under section 3(a) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and the transaction was therefore taxable as such. Section 4 did not convert the sale into an inside-Kashmir sale or displace the operation of section 3(a), as the provisions operated consistently on these facts. The reference was answered against the assessee and the assessment was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>