<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (12) TMI 168 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153697</link>
    <description>For purchase tax on cotton under item 2 of the Second Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the taxable event is the purchase of kapas before conversion into ginned cotton. Where reliable purchase accounts exist, later loss in weight or wastage during ginning does not reduce the purchase turnover. In the absence of proper accounts, the assessing authority may estimate purchase value by reference to sales turnover as a substitute for actual consideration, but no notional deduction is permitted for invisible loss or wastage after purchase unless the statute expressly provides for it. The assessment restored by the Board of Revenue was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 12:28:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (12) TMI 168 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153697</link>
      <description>For purchase tax on cotton under item 2 of the Second Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the taxable event is the purchase of kapas before conversion into ginned cotton. Where reliable purchase accounts exist, later loss in weight or wastage during ginning does not reduce the purchase turnover. In the absence of proper accounts, the assessing authority may estimate purchase value by reference to sales turnover as a substitute for actual consideration, but no notional deduction is permitted for invisible loss or wastage after purchase unless the statute expressly provides for it. The assessment restored by the Board of Revenue was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>