<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1134 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153691</link>
    <description>Unutilized Cenvat credit was treated as refundable in cash where the factory had closed and central excise registration had been surrendered, leaving no possibility of utilisation against future clearances. The prior Revenue-referred decision was distinguished because it involved a different factual setting in which credit could still be carried forward in the account. On these facts, the order allowing cash refund of the unused credit was upheld, consistent with decisions recognising refund when business operations have ceased.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1134 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153691</link>
      <description>Unutilized Cenvat credit was treated as refundable in cash where the factory had closed and central excise registration had been surrendered, leaving no possibility of utilisation against future clearances. The prior Revenue-referred decision was distinguished because it involved a different factual setting in which credit could still be carried forward in the account. On these facts, the order allowing cash refund of the unused credit was upheld, consistent with decisions recognising refund when business operations have ceased.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>