<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (12) TMI 166 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153675</link>
    <description>Where the tax, fee or penalty in dispute exceeds the statutory threshold, an appeal from an appellate order under the U.P. Sales Tax Act must be heard by a Bench of two members, and a single member cannot validly dispose of the appeal or the connected condonation application. By contrast, procedural directions relating to stay of further proceedings after remand fall within the Tribunal&#039;s ancillary and procedural powers, and may be dealt with by a single member where the Act and Rules permit such regulation. The text distinguishes between jurisdiction to finally decide appeals above the threshold and competence to handle procedural stay matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 18:35:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (12) TMI 166 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153675</link>
      <description>Where the tax, fee or penalty in dispute exceeds the statutory threshold, an appeal from an appellate order under the U.P. Sales Tax Act must be heard by a Bench of two members, and a single member cannot validly dispose of the appeal or the connected condonation application. By contrast, procedural directions relating to stay of further proceedings after remand fall within the Tribunal&#039;s ancillary and procedural powers, and may be dealt with by a single member where the Act and Rules permit such regulation. The text distinguishes between jurisdiction to finally decide appeals above the threshold and competence to handle procedural stay matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>