<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1128 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153658</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision in a case involving the misdeclaration of the value of an imported Offset Printing Machine. The Tribunal supported the assessment based on the value of a new machine, granted abatement, and upheld the confiscation and penalty imposed for misdeclaration. The importer&#039;s appeal challenging these decisions was rejected, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s approach and the penalties imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:37:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1128 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153658</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision in a case involving the misdeclaration of the value of an imported Offset Printing Machine. The Tribunal supported the assessment based on the value of a new machine, granted abatement, and upheld the confiscation and penalty imposed for misdeclaration. The importer&#039;s appeal challenging these decisions was rejected, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s approach and the penalties imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>