<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 836 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153641</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order confiscating misdeclared imported goods, citing discrepancies in weight and description. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the invoice, the Tribunal deemed the misdeclaration serious, enhancing the goods&#039; value and imposing fines and penalties. The appeal was rejected, emphasizing the significance of accurate declarations, the severity of misdeclaration under customs law, and the discretionary authority in determining penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:41:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 836 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153641</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order confiscating misdeclared imported goods, citing discrepancies in weight and description. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the invoice, the Tribunal deemed the misdeclaration serious, enhancing the goods&#039; value and imposing fines and penalties. The appeal was rejected, emphasizing the significance of accurate declarations, the severity of misdeclaration under customs law, and the discretionary authority in determining penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>