<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1036 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153631</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to allow the adjustment of duty paid on Lead Anode Sheets against the duty demand on Lead Headers. The appeal by the Department was rejected as the Tribunal found the adjustment reasonable and legally sound based on the specific circumstances and subsequent Supreme Court judgment developments. The dispute centered on this duty adjustment issue, leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:23:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1036 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153631</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to allow the adjustment of duty paid on Lead Anode Sheets against the duty demand on Lead Headers. The appeal by the Department was rejected as the Tribunal found the adjustment reasonable and legally sound based on the specific circumstances and subsequent Supreme Court judgment developments. The dispute centered on this duty adjustment issue, leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>