<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 763 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153624</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the enhancement of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. It was held that Section 11AC applies to cases involving intentional evasion of duty, not negligence. The loss of excisable goods due to negligence did not meet the criteria for invoking Section 11AC. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the review appeal for penalty enhancement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:10:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 763 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153624</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the enhancement of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. It was held that Section 11AC applies to cases involving intentional evasion of duty, not negligence. The loss of excisable goods due to negligence did not meet the criteria for invoking Section 11AC. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the review appeal for penalty enhancement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>