<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (5) TMI 170 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153618</link>
    <description>Section 391(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 allows the company court to stay proceedings only where they threaten the company&#039;s estate or concern recovery of an ascertained liability. It does not extend to statutory proceedings before sales tax authorities for assessment or for levy of penalty under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975, because those matters fall within the authorities&#039; exclusive jurisdiction. The company court cannot restrain the statutory authority from performing duties under the fiscal statute or stay the statute&#039;s operation itself. The stay of penalty proceedings was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:46:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (5) TMI 170 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153618</link>
      <description>Section 391(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 allows the company court to stay proceedings only where they threaten the company&#039;s estate or concern recovery of an ascertained liability. It does not extend to statutory proceedings before sales tax authorities for assessment or for levy of penalty under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975, because those matters fall within the authorities&#039; exclusive jurisdiction. The company court cannot restrain the statutory authority from performing duties under the fiscal statute or stay the statute&#039;s operation itself. The stay of penalty proceedings was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>