<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 745 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153614</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appeal filed by the department, overturning the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s decision to load 20% to the declared assessable value without following the relevant sub-rules. Despite the power to remand the case, the appellate authority chose to set aside the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s order and directed acceptance of the declared assessable value, citing non-application of mind. The Tribunal rejected the appeal, affirming the acceptance of declared assessable values in finalizing provisional assessments to streamline the process and avoid delays, in line with similar cases and to prevent multiplicity of proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:16:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 745 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153614</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appeal filed by the department, overturning the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s decision to load 20% to the declared assessable value without following the relevant sub-rules. Despite the power to remand the case, the appellate authority chose to set aside the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s order and directed acceptance of the declared assessable value, citing non-application of mind. The Tribunal rejected the appeal, affirming the acceptance of declared assessable values in finalizing provisional assessments to streamline the process and avoid delays, in line with similar cases and to prevent multiplicity of proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>