<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1032 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153607</link>
    <description>The applications for restoration of appeals (Nos. 851-853/07) were dismissed by the Bench due to non-compliance with the order of pre-deposit and untimely filing of the restoration application. The applicant failed to produce the compliance report before the Bench, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. Additionally, the restoration application was filed beyond the three-month period from the date of the final order dismissing the appeals. The Bench emphasized the importance of adhering to the three-month time limit for filing restoration applications and dismissed the applications in this case due to the lack of cause for the delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:52:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1032 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153607</link>
      <description>The applications for restoration of appeals (Nos. 851-853/07) were dismissed by the Bench due to non-compliance with the order of pre-deposit and untimely filing of the restoration application. The applicant failed to produce the compliance report before the Bench, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. Additionally, the restoration application was filed beyond the three-month period from the date of the final order dismissing the appeals. The Bench emphasized the importance of adhering to the three-month time limit for filing restoration applications and dismissed the applications in this case due to the lack of cause for the delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>