<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 760 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153601</link>
    <description>The case revolves around the failure of the assessee to surrender Cenvat credit during a switch to a new SSI exemption scheme. The Revenue argued for forfeiture of the credit to safeguard revenue interests. The Commissioner (Appeals) was criticized for not considering the Cenvat credit in WIP, departing from the Adjudication order. The Tribunal stressed the importance of transitional provisions to prevent undue enrichment, remanding the matter for a detailed review. The judgment underscores compliance with transitional provisions to avoid revenue prejudice and emphasizes thorough examination for fair outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 760 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153601</link>
      <description>The case revolves around the failure of the assessee to surrender Cenvat credit during a switch to a new SSI exemption scheme. The Revenue argued for forfeiture of the credit to safeguard revenue interests. The Commissioner (Appeals) was criticized for not considering the Cenvat credit in WIP, departing from the Adjudication order. The Tribunal stressed the importance of transitional provisions to prevent undue enrichment, remanding the matter for a detailed review. The judgment underscores compliance with transitional provisions to avoid revenue prejudice and emphasizes thorough examination for fair outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>