<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 727 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153590</link>
    <description>A demand based on shortage of raw material cannot be sustained unless the department proves diversion, non-receipt of the goods, or another basis showing non-discharge of duty by the supplier. Here, the shortage was explained by the manner of accounting and invoice weighment, and the available records were not properly verified or investigated. In the absence of evidence of diversion or an admission by the assessee, the burden remained on the department and was not discharged, so the demand failed. As the demand did not survive, the penalty under Rule 15(2) of the Central Excise Rules also fell away.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:17:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 727 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153590</link>
      <description>A demand based on shortage of raw material cannot be sustained unless the department proves diversion, non-receipt of the goods, or another basis showing non-discharge of duty by the supplier. Here, the shortage was explained by the manner of accounting and invoice weighment, and the available records were not properly verified or investigated. In the absence of evidence of diversion or an admission by the assessee, the burden remained on the department and was not discharged, so the demand failed. As the demand did not survive, the penalty under Rule 15(2) of the Central Excise Rules also fell away.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>