<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 682 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153577</link>
    <description>A show cause notice invoking Modvat provisions after their substitution by the Cenvat regime is unsustainable where no saving clause preserves the earlier provisions. Once Notification No. 27/2000-C.E. (N.T.) replaced Modvat with Cenvat, the earlier rules were no longer in force on the date of the notice, so a demand founded on them lacked statutory support.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 11:12:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 682 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153577</link>
      <description>A show cause notice invoking Modvat provisions after their substitution by the Cenvat regime is unsustainable where no saving clause preserves the earlier provisions. Once Notification No. 27/2000-C.E. (N.T.) replaced Modvat with Cenvat, the earlier rules were no longer in force on the date of the notice, so a demand founded on them lacked statutory support.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>