<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 240 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153563</link>
    <description>An Additional Assistant Commercial Tax Officer, when duly authorised by the Commissioner under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, was treated as competent to exercise the powers attached to the substantive office, including search, seizure, and collection of tax and composition fee. The term &quot;additional&quot; was construed as describing an officer appointed to perform extra work of the same office, not as creating a separate or lesser jurisdiction. The Commissioner&#039;s notification for the relevant district was held valid, and the challenge based on lack of jurisdiction or reliance on the Income-tax Act failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 18:21:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 240 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153563</link>
      <description>An Additional Assistant Commercial Tax Officer, when duly authorised by the Commissioner under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, was treated as competent to exercise the powers attached to the substantive office, including search, seizure, and collection of tax and composition fee. The term &quot;additional&quot; was construed as describing an officer appointed to perform extra work of the same office, not as creating a separate or lesser jurisdiction. The Commissioner&#039;s notification for the relevant district was held valid, and the challenge based on lack of jurisdiction or reliance on the Income-tax Act failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>