<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (10) TMI 197 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153542</link>
    <description>Sales tax exemption for &#039;chunni&#039; was denied because &#039;fodder&#039; in the common parlance sense was limited to roughages such as green grass, hay, bhusa and kadbi, and did not extend to concentrates or mixed cattle feed. The exclusion of cotton-seed and oil-cakes from the entry did not enlarge the scope of the exemption to cover all cattle feed. &#039;Chunni&#039; was also found to be distinct from both husk and bran, so it did not qualify for exemption under the notification covering husk of grains, cereals, pulses and rice, and bran. The exemption claim was rejected under both the statutory schedule entry and the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:48:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (10) TMI 197 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153542</link>
      <description>Sales tax exemption for &#039;chunni&#039; was denied because &#039;fodder&#039; in the common parlance sense was limited to roughages such as green grass, hay, bhusa and kadbi, and did not extend to concentrates or mixed cattle feed. The exclusion of cotton-seed and oil-cakes from the entry did not enlarge the scope of the exemption to cover all cattle feed. &#039;Chunni&#039; was also found to be distinct from both husk and bran, so it did not qualify for exemption under the notification covering husk of grains, cereals, pulses and rice, and bran. The exemption claim was rejected under both the statutory schedule entry and the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>