<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (6) TMI 164 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153539</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court dismissed the tax case, upholding the denial of exemption to the assessee under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The Court emphasized the requirement of concrete proof of a prior sale agreement between the dealer and foreign buyer for claiming exemption based on penultimate sales for export. Despite relying on affidavits from exporters, the assessee failed to provide original contracts or contemporaneous documents to substantiate the claim. The Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that the absence of corroborative evidence rendered the affidavits insufficient to validate the exemption claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:43:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (6) TMI 164 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153539</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court dismissed the tax case, upholding the denial of exemption to the assessee under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The Court emphasized the requirement of concrete proof of a prior sale agreement between the dealer and foreign buyer for claiming exemption based on penultimate sales for export. Despite relying on affidavits from exporters, the assessee failed to provide original contracts or contemporaneous documents to substantiate the claim. The Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that the absence of corroborative evidence rendered the affidavits insufficient to validate the exemption claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>