<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (8) TMI 211 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153538</link>
    <description>Extraction and collection of boulders did not amount to manufacture under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, because manufacture in the charging sense requires the emergence of a new and distinct commercial article with a different name, character or use. The Court held that the inclusive wording in the statutory definition, referring to producing, collecting, extracting, preparing or making goods, does not treat every such activity as manufacture. As the assessee merely collected and supplied boulders from hillocks and no new commercial commodity came into existence, liability as a manufacturer did not arise under the sales tax provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:41:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (8) TMI 211 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153538</link>
      <description>Extraction and collection of boulders did not amount to manufacture under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, because manufacture in the charging sense requires the emergence of a new and distinct commercial article with a different name, character or use. The Court held that the inclusive wording in the statutory definition, referring to producing, collecting, extracting, preparing or making goods, does not treat every such activity as manufacture. As the assessee merely collected and supplied boulders from hillocks and no new commercial commodity came into existence, liability as a manufacturer did not arise under the sales tax provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>