<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (10) TMI 198 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153529</link>
    <description>In the absence of a statutory prohibition, the first appellate authority may admit and act upon additional evidence, including declaration forms not produced before the assessing officer, when exercising appellate discretion. Rule 27(2)(i) required such forms for deduction claims before assessment, but it did not bar production at the appellate stage. Rule 50(2) permitted further enquiry by the first appellate authority, and the narrower restriction under rule 61 for the Tribunal did not limit that power. The absence of separately recorded reasons for accepting the declarations did not, by itself, invalidate the appellate decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:13:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (10) TMI 198 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153529</link>
      <description>In the absence of a statutory prohibition, the first appellate authority may admit and act upon additional evidence, including declaration forms not produced before the assessing officer, when exercising appellate discretion. Rule 27(2)(i) required such forms for deduction claims before assessment, but it did not bar production at the appellate stage. Rule 50(2) permitted further enquiry by the first appellate authority, and the narrower restriction under rule 61 for the Tribunal did not limit that power. The absence of separately recorded reasons for accepting the declarations did not, by itself, invalidate the appellate decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>