<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (1) TMI 178 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153517</link>
    <description>Check-post interception of goods permits scrutiny of invoices and transport documents and, where justified, further proceedings on the merits, but it does not authorise a coercive demand for advance tax or compounding fee before assessment when the accompanying papers disclose an inter-State transit sale. Tax liability arises only after a completed taxable sale is established and assessed; interception powers cannot be used on an erroneous assumption that the movement is a local sale. On those facts, the detention of the goods and the demand made as a condition for release were held illegal, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:40:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (1) TMI 178 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153517</link>
      <description>Check-post interception of goods permits scrutiny of invoices and transport documents and, where justified, further proceedings on the merits, but it does not authorise a coercive demand for advance tax or compounding fee before assessment when the accompanying papers disclose an inter-State transit sale. Tax liability arises only after a completed taxable sale is established and assessed; interception powers cannot be used on an erroneous assumption that the movement is a local sale. On those facts, the detention of the goods and the demand made as a condition for release were held illegal, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>