<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1125 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153492</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appeals with consequential relief. The reliance on the loose slip and retracted statements was deemed insufficient to prove the charges of undervaluation against the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:57:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1125 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153492</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appeals with consequential relief. The reliance on the loose slip and retracted statements was deemed insufficient to prove the charges of undervaluation against the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>