<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (5) TMI 216 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153490</link>
    <description>Where an efficacious statutory appellate remedy exists, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be invoked. The assessment order was appealable under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, with a first appeal to the Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner, a second appeal to the Sales Tax Tribunal, and a further reference on a question of law under section 42. As the petitioner gave no cogent reason to bypass that scheme, the writ petition was held not maintainable. The objection that an appeal would be time-barred also failed, because bona fide time spent pursuing a remedy in an incorrect forum under a misconception of law is excluded while computing limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:44:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (5) TMI 216 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153490</link>
      <description>Where an efficacious statutory appellate remedy exists, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be invoked. The assessment order was appealable under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, with a first appeal to the Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner, a second appeal to the Sales Tax Tribunal, and a further reference on a question of law under section 42. As the petitioner gave no cogent reason to bypass that scheme, the writ petition was held not maintainable. The objection that an appeal would be time-barred also failed, because bona fide time spent pursuing a remedy in an incorrect forum under a misconception of law is excluded while computing limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>