https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153489 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals related to duty demand and penalties on M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd. The correct valuation method for ducts supplied to M/s. Reliance Communication Infrastructure Ltd. was determined to be Rule 8. Penalties imposed on RCIL under Rule 26 were also set aside due to lack of evidence of wrongdoing. The appellants were not granted consequential relief as they had already paid excess duty. en-us Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Apr 2018 11:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153489 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals related to duty demand and penalties on M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd. The correct valuation method for ducts supplied to M/s. Reliance Communication Infrastructure Ltd. was determined to be Rule 8. Penalties imposed on RCIL under Rule 26 were also set aside due to lack of evidence of wrongdoing. The appellants were not granted consequential relief as they had already paid excess duty. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153489