<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 727 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153487</link>
    <description>Customs exemption under the IGCRDMEG framework was treated as unavailable only for breach of a procedural condition, not where the imported inputs were actually used for the intended manufacture in another unit of the same importer. Transfer of the goods was made with intimation to the Department, and no objection was raised; that acquiescence supported the view that the exemption could not be denied merely because consumption occurred outside the initially registered factory. On that basis, the demand of differential duty and penalty was held unsustainable, and the appellate relief was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 727 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153487</link>
      <description>Customs exemption under the IGCRDMEG framework was treated as unavailable only for breach of a procedural condition, not where the imported inputs were actually used for the intended manufacture in another unit of the same importer. Transfer of the goods was made with intimation to the Department, and no objection was raised; that acquiescence supported the view that the exemption could not be denied merely because consumption occurred outside the initially registered factory. On that basis, the demand of differential duty and penalty was held unsustainable, and the appellate relief was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>