<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 832 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153486</link>
    <description>Charges for hydraulic testing, repair and maintenance of cylinders were held not to form part of the assessable value of chlorine cleared through cylinders because the testing was permitted under the explosive licence, was also undertaken as a separate commercial service, and was separately taxed under the Finance Act, 1994. Rental charges collected for cylinders retained beyond the agreed free period were also excluded from assessable value because they related to post-sale retention and had no direct connection with the sale of the goods. The valuation dispute therefore failed on both counts and inclusion was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 832 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153486</link>
      <description>Charges for hydraulic testing, repair and maintenance of cylinders were held not to form part of the assessable value of chlorine cleared through cylinders because the testing was permitted under the explosive licence, was also undertaken as a separate commercial service, and was separately taxed under the Finance Act, 1994. Rental charges collected for cylinders retained beyond the agreed free period were also excluded from assessable value because they related to post-sale retention and had no direct connection with the sale of the goods. The valuation dispute therefore failed on both counts and inclusion was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>