<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1025 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153482</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 5,00,000 imposed on the appellant, a Superintendent, for allowing clearance of imports with misdeclaration of country of origin, breaching trust, and violating duties. The appellant&#039;s appeal was partly allowed due to the acknowledgment of the division of duties between the Superintendent and Inspector as mitigating factors, resulting in a reduction of the penalty from Rs. 10,00,000 to Rs. 5,00,000 to ensure justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:08:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1025 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153482</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 5,00,000 imposed on the appellant, a Superintendent, for allowing clearance of imports with misdeclaration of country of origin, breaching trust, and violating duties. The appellant&#039;s appeal was partly allowed due to the acknowledgment of the division of duties between the Superintendent and Inspector as mitigating factors, resulting in a reduction of the penalty from Rs. 10,00,000 to Rs. 5,00,000 to ensure justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>