<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1018 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153429</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the demand for interest under Section 11AB and the interpretation of Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The case emphasized the significance of factual evidence in determining the correct application of rules concerning Cenvat credit availment and reversal, indicating that interest may not be demanded if the credit remains unutilized for duty payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 09:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1018 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153429</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the demand for interest under Section 11AB and the interpretation of Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The case emphasized the significance of factual evidence in determining the correct application of rules concerning Cenvat credit availment and reversal, indicating that interest may not be demanded if the credit remains unutilized for duty payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>