<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 234 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153417</link>
    <description>Section 4(1) of the Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962 was upheld because the statute supplied sufficient legislative guidance through its charging scheme, rate ceiling and exemption framework, so the excessive delegation challenge failed. The earlier Full Bench ruling was read as preserving the exemption for halwais until lawfully withdrawn, not as reviving benefits for unrelated classes. SRO No. 187 could not operate retrospectively from 1 April 1977 because subordinate legislation needs express or implied statutory authority, though the notification was not discriminatory on its final classification. Halwais also could not be taxed by implication under the bakery and confectionary entry, since ambiguity in a taxing provision must be resolved in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:56:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 234 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153417</link>
      <description>Section 4(1) of the Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962 was upheld because the statute supplied sufficient legislative guidance through its charging scheme, rate ceiling and exemption framework, so the excessive delegation challenge failed. The earlier Full Bench ruling was read as preserving the exemption for halwais until lawfully withdrawn, not as reviving benefits for unrelated classes. SRO No. 187 could not operate retrospectively from 1 April 1977 because subordinate legislation needs express or implied statutory authority, though the notification was not discriminatory on its final classification. Halwais also could not be taxed by implication under the bakery and confectionary entry, since ambiguity in a taxing provision must be resolved in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>