<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 232 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153413</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed the tax revision case, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the transactions in question, amounting to a turnover of Rs. 1,62,294.30 during the assessment year 1976-77, were branch transfers and not inter-State sales. The Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the lack of a direct link between the assessee in Madras and the buyers in Andhra Pradesh precluded categorizing the transactions as inter-State sales. The markings on the consignments indicating the purchaser&#039;s name were deemed insufficient to establish inter-State transactions, and the Court differentiated the case from a previous Supreme Court judgment where a direct contract of sale existed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:39:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 232 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153413</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed the tax revision case, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the transactions in question, amounting to a turnover of Rs. 1,62,294.30 during the assessment year 1976-77, were branch transfers and not inter-State sales. The Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the lack of a direct link between the assessee in Madras and the buyers in Andhra Pradesh precluded categorizing the transactions as inter-State sales. The markings on the consignments indicating the purchaser&#039;s name were deemed insufficient to establish inter-State transactions, and the Court differentiated the case from a previous Supreme Court judgment where a direct contract of sale existed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>