<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 266 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153392</link>
    <description>The transfer of share capital to the Central Government under the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 did not make the company&#039;s assets the property of the Central Government. The company remained a distinct legal person, and its property could not be treated as Government property merely because the shareholding vested in the State; accordingly, exemption from sales tax under Article 285 was not available on that basis. The court also held that the writ challenge to the assessment notice was premature because the taxability of salvage transactions involved factual issues that had to be examined by the statutory authorities first.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:10:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 266 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153392</link>
      <description>The transfer of share capital to the Central Government under the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 did not make the company&#039;s assets the property of the Central Government. The company remained a distinct legal person, and its property could not be treated as Government property merely because the shareholding vested in the State; accordingly, exemption from sales tax under Article 285 was not available on that basis. The court also held that the writ challenge to the assessment notice was premature because the taxability of salvage transactions involved factual issues that had to be examined by the statutory authorities first.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>