<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1012 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153379</link>
    <description>A duty demand based solely on an audit objection alleging excess scrap and processing loss in job-work manufacture cannot be sustained without independent investigation into the raw materials, supply sources, and manufacturing process. Mere comparison of wastage percentages between self-manufactured and job-work goods is insufficient where no evidence supports clandestine removal or rebuts the assessee&#039;s explanation that different materials generated higher loss. The demand here rested on presumption rather than proof, and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:26:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1012 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153379</link>
      <description>A duty demand based solely on an audit objection alleging excess scrap and processing loss in job-work manufacture cannot be sustained without independent investigation into the raw materials, supply sources, and manufacturing process. Mere comparison of wastage percentages between self-manufactured and job-work goods is insufficient where no evidence supports clandestine removal or rebuts the assessee&#039;s explanation that different materials generated higher loss. The demand here rested on presumption rather than proof, and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>