https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153375 The tribunal upheld the duty and interest liability for the period in question, confirmed a reduced penalty of 25%, rejected an appeal for an equivalent penalty, and remanded the issue of Cenvat credit eligibility for further consideration by the adjudicating authority. The tribunal emphasized the importance of seeking clarification from the department before discontinuing duty payments based on a consultant's opinion and established that suppression of facts and intention to evade duty must be proven. en-us Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:02:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153375 The tribunal upheld the duty and interest liability for the period in question, confirmed a reduced penalty of 25%, rejected an appeal for an equivalent penalty, and remanded the issue of Cenvat credit eligibility for further consideration by the adjudicating authority. The tribunal emphasized the importance of seeking clarification from the department before discontinuing duty payments based on a consultant's opinion and established that suppression of facts and intention to evade duty must be proven. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153375