<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 665 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153363</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, citing a factual error in the tribunal&#039;s order regarding duty demand for manufacturing activities. The court directed the adjudicating authority to review the matter independently without influence from the tribunal or the court, leaving all contentions regarding manufacturing activity open for the authority&#039;s determination. The judgment concluded without imposing any costs on either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 18:06:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 665 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153363</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, citing a factual error in the tribunal&#039;s order regarding duty demand for manufacturing activities. The court directed the adjudicating authority to review the matter independently without influence from the tribunal or the court, leaving all contentions regarding manufacturing activity open for the authority&#039;s determination. The judgment concluded without imposing any costs on either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>