<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (11) TMI 149 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153358</link>
    <description>Reopening reassessment for escaped turnover under section 19 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act requires material that can reasonably support the conclusion that taxable turnover escaped assessment; account statements, later invoices and a bank resolution were insufficient to show that the assessee owned the goods or effected sales, so reopening for 1972-73 and 1973-74 was without jurisdiction. Where the character of transactions depends on an agency arrangement, the primary contracts and appointment documents must be examined to determine whether property passed to the assessee; because the Tribunal relied mainly on invoices and a letter without properly assessing the governing agreements, its finding that the assessee itself made the sales for 1974-75 and 1975-76 could not stand and required fresh disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:56:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (11) TMI 149 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153358</link>
      <description>Reopening reassessment for escaped turnover under section 19 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act requires material that can reasonably support the conclusion that taxable turnover escaped assessment; account statements, later invoices and a bank resolution were insufficient to show that the assessee owned the goods or effected sales, so reopening for 1972-73 and 1973-74 was without jurisdiction. Where the character of transactions depends on an agency arrangement, the primary contracts and appointment documents must be examined to determine whether property passed to the assessee; because the Tribunal relied mainly on invoices and a letter without properly assessing the governing agreements, its finding that the assessee itself made the sales for 1974-75 and 1975-76 could not stand and required fresh disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>