<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 264 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153355</link>
    <description>Aluminium rods are not covered by entry 64 of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, because taxing entries must be construed in their ordinary commercial sense. In metal trade usage, rods are distinct from bars: rods are understood as long round pieces, while bars generally have a non-round cross-section. The later insertion of &quot;rods and wire rods&quot; into entry 64 supported this narrower reading. The court also rejected a construction that would treat the entry as covering all aluminium articles, since that would undermine the specific items listed and the scheme of the single-point levy. The goods were therefore taxable under the general charging provision, not the special levy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:39:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 264 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153355</link>
      <description>Aluminium rods are not covered by entry 64 of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, because taxing entries must be construed in their ordinary commercial sense. In metal trade usage, rods are distinct from bars: rods are understood as long round pieces, while bars generally have a non-round cross-section. The later insertion of &quot;rods and wire rods&quot; into entry 64 supported this narrower reading. The court also rejected a construction that would treat the entry as covering all aluminium articles, since that would undermine the specific items listed and the scheme of the single-point levy. The goods were therefore taxable under the general charging provision, not the special levy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>