<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 738 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153337</link>
    <description>The Court held that the petitioner cannot currently enforce the appellate order for the release of the imported car as the department retains the right to appeal. The petitioner was advised to wait until the appeal period expires. If no appeal is filed within the prescribed period, the petitioner can seek the vehicle&#039;s release through the Tribunal or refile in Court. The Court closed the writ petition, granting liberty to approach the Tribunal if necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:12:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 738 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153337</link>
      <description>The Court held that the petitioner cannot currently enforce the appellate order for the release of the imported car as the department retains the right to appeal. The petitioner was advised to wait until the appeal period expires. If no appeal is filed within the prescribed period, the petitioner can seek the vehicle&#039;s release through the Tribunal or refile in Court. The Court closed the writ petition, granting liberty to approach the Tribunal if necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>