<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (1) TMI 177 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153335</link>
    <description>Compliance with Rule 77 of the U.P. Sales Tax Rules was sufficient where notices were sent by registered post to the firm&#039;s address; individual service on each partner was not required. The petitioner&#039;s bare denial of partnership, unsupported by any material, was insufficient to displace the assessing authority&#039;s finding based on enquiries and official confirmation. As no procedural defect or factual basis was shown to invalidate the assessment or recovery action, the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:09:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (1) TMI 177 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153335</link>
      <description>Compliance with Rule 77 of the U.P. Sales Tax Rules was sufficient where notices were sent by registered post to the firm&#039;s address; individual service on each partner was not required. The petitioner&#039;s bare denial of partnership, unsupported by any material, was insufficient to displace the assessing authority&#039;s finding based on enquiries and official confirmation. As no procedural defect or factual basis was shown to invalidate the assessment or recovery action, the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>