<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 830 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153334</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court emphasized the significance of the classification issue in the case, leading to the conclusion that the penalty imposition was unwarranted. Referring to relevant case law, the Court highlighted the necessity for the Revenue to prove the elements of Section 11AC, including the intent to evade duty payment. Given the factual findings and legal precedents, the Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s discretion in penalty matters aligned with statutory requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 830 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153334</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court emphasized the significance of the classification issue in the case, leading to the conclusion that the penalty imposition was unwarranted. Referring to relevant case law, the Court highlighted the necessity for the Revenue to prove the elements of Section 11AC, including the intent to evade duty payment. Given the factual findings and legal precedents, the Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s discretion in penalty matters aligned with statutory requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>