<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (10) TMI 161 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153329</link>
    <description>The Court found that the Sales Tax Officer provided adjustment for certain payments made by the petitioners but disputed specific payments mentioned in the recovery certificates. Due to insufficient evidence, the Court suggested pursuing other remedies for grievances regarding these payments. Additionally, the Court ordered all attached properties to be sold in a single auction, rejecting the request to sell them in separate lots. The petition was disposed of without costs, and the stay order was lifted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:44:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (10) TMI 161 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153329</link>
      <description>The Court found that the Sales Tax Officer provided adjustment for certain payments made by the petitioners but disputed specific payments mentioned in the recovery certificates. Due to insufficient evidence, the Court suggested pursuing other remedies for grievances regarding these payments. Additionally, the Court ordered all attached properties to be sold in a single auction, rejecting the request to sell them in separate lots. The petition was disposed of without costs, and the stay order was lifted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>