<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 263 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153322</link>
    <description>Old jewellery purchased from non-dealers and converted into new jewellery for local sale was treated as consumed in manufacture, so purchase tax was payable under section 7-A(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. By contrast, goods personally carried by the dealer from Tamil Nadu to Bombay were not regarded as being &quot;despatched&quot; outside the State within section 7-A(1)(c), because the provision contemplates sending goods and not mere personal conveyance by the owner. The turnover relating to personal carriage was therefore excluded from tax, and the matter was remitted for consequential recalculation of liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:23:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 263 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153322</link>
      <description>Old jewellery purchased from non-dealers and converted into new jewellery for local sale was treated as consumed in manufacture, so purchase tax was payable under section 7-A(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. By contrast, goods personally carried by the dealer from Tamil Nadu to Bombay were not regarded as being &quot;despatched&quot; outside the State within section 7-A(1)(c), because the provision contemplates sending goods and not mere personal conveyance by the owner. The turnover relating to personal carriage was therefore excluded from tax, and the matter was remitted for consequential recalculation of liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>