<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 849 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153307</link>
    <description>The Tribunal and Court dismissed the penalty imposition under Section 271(1)(c) for concealing income related to enhanced compensation for land acquisition. They found no intention to suppress taxable income due to ongoing disputes over taxability, timing of legal precedents, and assessment completion before relevant Supreme Court judgments. The Court emphasized that the appellant could not have intended to conceal income based on subsequent legal developments, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 849 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153307</link>
      <description>The Tribunal and Court dismissed the penalty imposition under Section 271(1)(c) for concealing income related to enhanced compensation for land acquisition. They found no intention to suppress taxable income due to ongoing disputes over taxability, timing of legal precedents, and assessment completion before relevant Supreme Court judgments. The Court emphasized that the appellant could not have intended to conceal income based on subsequent legal developments, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>