<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (11) TMI 165 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153284</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the petition, quashed the revising authority&#039;s order, and directed the revising authority to dispose of the restoration application on merits in accordance with the law. The court emphasized that the revising authority had erred in finding delay on the part of the assessee and in questioning its jurisdiction to set aside the ex parte order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (11) TMI 165 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153284</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the petition, quashed the revising authority&#039;s order, and directed the revising authority to dispose of the restoration application on merits in accordance with the law. The court emphasized that the revising authority had erred in finding delay on the part of the assessee and in questioning its jurisdiction to set aside the ex parte order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>