<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (6) TMI 118 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153282</link>
    <description>Section 28A(6) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act confines check-post detention to cases where the penalty under section 28A(4) remains unpaid; once the penalty is paid, the officer has no general power to retain goods for further investigation. Continued detention after payment is without authority of law, and instructions from superior officers cannot validate an unauthorised seizure. The detained goods were therefore ordered to be released to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2013 17:19:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (6) TMI 118 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153282</link>
      <description>Section 28A(6) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act confines check-post detention to cases where the penalty under section 28A(4) remains unpaid; once the penalty is paid, the officer has no general power to retain goods for further investigation. Continued detention after payment is without authority of law, and instructions from superior officers cannot validate an unauthorised seizure. The detained goods were therefore ordered to be released to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>