<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (12) TMI 146 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153262</link>
    <description>Penalty for delayed tax payment is not automatic and applies only where the default is without reasonable cause. The governing test is whether the dealer acted deliberately in defiance of the law, in conscious disregard of the obligation, or with contumacious or dishonest conduct, reflecting the quasi-criminal nature of the proceedings. The department bears the initial burden to show a prima facie default without reasonable cause, after which the assessee may establish reasonable cause on a balance of probabilities. On the stated facts, a bona fide but mistaken belief that earlier permission continued was treated as reasonable cause, so penalty was not leviable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2013 15:40:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (12) TMI 146 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153262</link>
      <description>Penalty for delayed tax payment is not automatic and applies only where the default is without reasonable cause. The governing test is whether the dealer acted deliberately in defiance of the law, in conscious disregard of the obligation, or with contumacious or dishonest conduct, reflecting the quasi-criminal nature of the proceedings. The department bears the initial burden to show a prima facie default without reasonable cause, after which the assessee may establish reasonable cause on a balance of probabilities. On the stated facts, a bona fide but mistaken belief that earlier permission continued was treated as reasonable cause, so penalty was not leviable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>