<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 365 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153257</link>
    <description>At the investigation stage, criminal proceedings should not be quashed in writ jurisdiction on the basis of disputed facts, affidavits, or documents not forming part of the police record. Allegations of mala fides must be specifically pleaded and proved; they cannot be inferred merely from non-consideration of some material or from the conduct of officials. A sanction order that reflects consideration of the case diary and related material is valid if granted before cognizance. Since the FIR and charge-sheets disclosed a prima facie case, the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction in quashing the proceedings, and the quashing order was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 365 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153257</link>
      <description>At the investigation stage, criminal proceedings should not be quashed in writ jurisdiction on the basis of disputed facts, affidavits, or documents not forming part of the police record. Allegations of mala fides must be specifically pleaded and proved; they cannot be inferred merely from non-consideration of some material or from the conduct of officials. A sanction order that reflects consideration of the case diary and related material is valid if granted before cognizance. Since the FIR and charge-sheets disclosed a prima facie case, the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction in quashing the proceedings, and the quashing order was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>